Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Entry #2: Racial Advertising against Blacks in 1930s

"22 Shockingly Racist Ads." Neat Designs. N.p., 2013. Web. 10 Feb. 2014. <http://neatdesigns.net/22-shockingly-racist-ads/>.


MDSB62 Media Portfolio Entry #2Image from 20th Century no later than 1980s & Commercial advertising
By: Annie Duong

Racial Advertising against Blacks in 1930s


          Advertisements from the 1930s are seen today as extremely appalling and unspeakable due to anti-racism. As years passed by, discrimination against race has changed drastically. We no longer see racism depicted in advertisements, although stereotypes of certain characteristic traits still exist in the media. In the 1930s, there were advertisements for “blackface make-ups”. These were to be used for theatrical purposes. Blackface make-up are usually made from burnt cork or black grease paint that are applied to the face and body and their lips would be thickened with red or white paint (Padgett). The “Nigger Make-Up” is deemed racist for many reasons, such as the choice of language that was used and the man’s physical characteristics.

          In the advertisement, words such as “nigger”, “burnt”, and “blacking” are racist slurs because it separates white people from black people. The language that were used also conveys a sense of white supremacy in a way that white people are able to “change” their appearance or skin colour to look like a black person as a form of mockery. Whereas, if a black person were to change their appearance or skin colour to look like a white person, it is unacceptable and is punishable, especially in the era of 1930s. For example, “[w]hen black women actresses like Lena Horne appeared in mainstream cinema most white viewers were not aware that they were looking at black females unless the film was specifically coded as being about blacks” (Hooks, 119). Hooks explains that in order for Lena Horne to be accepted as a black woman playing a white character is if the audience does not know that. Since racial segregation still took place in the 1930s, it is unlikely that cinemas will tolerate black characters pretending to be white or even black characters in general.

          Another point that makes the advertisement racist is the fact that the physical characteristic traits are exaggerated. The “Nigger Make-Up” comes in the form of a mask instead of using burnt cork or black grease paint in order to prevent the skin from “blacking”. In the ad, it suggests that the mask can be “slipped on or off in a minute” and it also comes with a top hat, which draws on the element of stereotyping the way black people dress. The man in the ad is wearing a mask that exaggerates the dark skin tone and the whiteness of the teeth and eyes, depicting the character as abhorrent and unattractive. Stuart Hall argues that “[s]tereotyping deploys a strategy of ‘splitting’. It divides the normal and the acceptable from the abnormal and the unacceptable. It then expels everything which does not fit, which is different” (247). The blackface mask in this advertisement establishes the strategy of splitting by creating a distinction between what it looks like to be black compared to being white. The mask acts as a division between the normal and the abnormal. 














Works Cited


Hall, Stuart, Jessica Evans, and Sean Nixon. Representation. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE
          Publications Ltd, 2013.

Hooks, Bell. Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End Press, 1992.

Padgett, Ken. "History of Blackface." Blackface. N.p., 01 Nov 2013. Web. 10 Feb. 2014.                      <http://www.black-face.com/>.

"22 Shockingly Racist Ads." Neat Designs. N.p., 2013. Web. 10 Feb. 
           2014. <http://neatdesigns.net/22shockingly-racist-ads/>.










Entry #1: The Media’s Approach towards the LGBT Community



Screenshot of http://www.google.ca homepage on February 6th, 2014


MDSB62 Media Portfolio Entry #1Graphic and typography & Journalism
By: Annie Duong



The Media’s Approach towards the LGBT Community



          Having the 2014 Olympics held in Sochi this year has created great uproars and complaints from around the world and the media about Russia's anti-gay laws. Some Olympic teams have gone through the extent to dedicate their 2014 Olympic uniforms to supporting gay rights and protest against Russia's anti-gay laws. For instance, the Germany's Olympic team will be wearing colourful uniforms as their way of making a political statement about anti-gay laws in Russia. The trend of this incident has reached media and the online community in a profound way. Users online are constantly sharing news about Germany's flashy outfits and on-going debates regarding this incident on Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, and other social media blogs and websites.

          With the Olympic Games and the protest against Russia's anti-gay laws going on, Google stepped up their game to show their support. On February 6th, 2014, google.ca changed their homepage logo to a colourful theme and images of the Olympic games with the following statement written on the bottom of the page, "'The practice of sport is a human right. every individual must have the possibility of practicing sport, without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play.'--Olympic Charter", which signifies Google's attempt to eliminate discrimination against the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community. To catch the viewer's attention, Google has made use of colours and visual representations.

          Colours can have different meanings when they are placed in certain contexts. In this case, Google have used colours to portray the idea of supporting the LGBT community because colours of the rainbow are commonly known as symbols of gay pride. Campbell et al. pointed out that, "[c]olour choices have great impact on image. We consciously respond to color everyday, and we are constantly making aesthetic choices related to color" (55). Google has appropriated Campbell et al.'s point by corresponding colours of the gay pride to take a stand for gay rights.


          Google's pro-gay doodle has demonstrated a visually effective image. Google is commonly known to change its homepage doodle to match special occasions such as the celebration of holidays, birthdays, and current events. Google has always been up to date with its doodles. The images of six Olympic sports show Google's excitement and celebration of the 2014 Olympics at Sochi. The composition of the doodle is also very appealing because the images of the Olympic games are placed right in the centre of each colour block, which conveys the message that there should be no discrimination in the Olympic spirit. Berger argued that "when an image is presented as a work of art, the way people look at it is affected by a whole series of learnt assumptions about art. Assumptions concerning: beauty, truth, genius, civilization, form, status, taste, etc." (11). The way Google's pro-gay doodle is presented is a form of art that establishes the beauty of the Olympic games--a place where nations gather around each other to play and compete in sports.












Works Cited
Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books, 1972.
Campbell et al. Media in Society. New York: St. Martin’s, 2014.


Submitted: 12 February 2014